PostgreSQL 7.4.3 Documentation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Prev | Fast Backward | Chapter 31. JDBC Interface | Fast Forward | Next |
JDBC 2 introduced standard connection pooling features in an add-on API known as the JDBC 2.0 Optional Package (also known as the JDBC 2.0 Standard Extension). These features have since been included in the core JDBC 3 API. The PostgreSQL JDBC drivers support these features if it has been compiled with JDK 1.3.x in combination with the JDBC 2.0 Optional Package (JDBC 2), or with JDK 1.4 or higher (JDBC 3). Most application servers include the JDBC 2.0 Optional Package, but it is also available separately from the Sun JDBC download site.
The JDBC API provides a client and a server interface for connection pooling. The client interface is javax.sql.DataSource, which is what application code will typically use to acquire a pooled database connection. The server interface is javax.sql.ConnectionPoolDataSource, which is how most application servers will interface with the PostgreSQL JDBC driver.
In an application server environment, the application server configuration will typically refer to the PostgreSQL ConnectionPoolDataSource implementation, while the application component code will typically acquire a DataSource implementation provided by the application server (not by PostgreSQL).
For an environment without an application server, PostgreSQL provides two implementations of DataSource which an application can use directly. One implementation performs connection pooling, while the other simply provides access to database connections through the DataSource interface without any pooling. Again, these implementations should not be used in an application server environment unless the application server does not support the ConnectionPoolDataSource interface.
ConnectionPoolDataSource
PostgreSQL includes one implementation
of ConnectionPoolDataSource
for
JDBC 2 and one for JDBC 3,
as shown in Table 31-1.
Table 31-1. ConnectionPoolDataSource
Implementations
JDBC | Implementation Class |
---|---|
2 | org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.ConnectionPool |
3 | org.postgresql.jdbc3.Jdbc3ConnectionPool |
Both implementations use the same configuration scheme.
JDBC requires that a
ConnectionPoolDataSource
be configured via
JavaBean properties, shown in Table 31-2,
so there are get and set methods for each of these properties.
Table 31-2. ConnectionPoolDataSource
Configuration Properties
Property | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
serverName | String | PostgreSQL database server host name |
databaseName | String | PostgreSQL database name |
portNumber | int | TCP port which the PostgreSQL database server is listening on (or 0 to use the default port) |
user | String | User used to make database connections |
password | String | Password used to make database connections |
defaultAutoCommit | boolean | Whether connections should have autocommit enabled or disabled when they are supplied to the caller. The default is false, to disable autocommit. |
Many application servers use a properties-style syntax to configure these properties, so it would not be unusual to enter properties as a block of text. If the application server provides a single area to enter all the properties, they might be listed like this:
serverName=localhost databaseName=test user=testuser password=testpassword
Or, if semicolons are used as separators instead of newlines, it could look like this:
serverName=localhost;databaseName=test;user=testuser;password=testpassword
DataSource
PostgreSQL includes two implementations of DataSource for JDBC 2 and two for JDBC 3, as shown in Table 31-3. The pooling implementations do not actually close connections when the client calls the close method, but instead return the connections to a pool of available connections for other clients to use. This avoids any overhead of repeatedly opening and closing connections, and allows a large number of clients to share a small number of database connections.
The pooling data-source implementation provided here is not the most feature-rich in the world. Among other things, connections are never closed until the pool itself is closed; there is no way to shrink the pool. As well, connections requested for users other than the default configured user are not pooled. Many application servers provide more advanced pooling features and use the ConnectionPoolDataSource implementation instead.
Table 31-3. DataSource
Implementations
JDBC | Pooling | Implementation Class |
---|---|---|
2 | No | org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.SimpleDataSource |
2 | Yes | org.postgresql.jdbc2.optional.PoolingDataSource |
3 | No | org.postgresql.jdbc3.Jdbc3SimpleDataSource |
3 | Yes | org.postgresql.jdbc3.Jdbc3PoolingDataSource |
All the implementations use the same configuration scheme. JDBC requires that a DataSource be configured via JavaBean properties, shown in Table 31-4, so there are get and set methods for each of these properties.
Table 31-4. DataSource
Configuration Properties
Property | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
serverName | String | PostgreSQL database server host name |
databaseName | String | PostgreSQL database name |
portNumber | int | TCP port which the PostgreSQL database server is listening on (or 0 to use the default port) |
user | String | User used to make database connections |
password | String | Password used to make database connections |
The pooling implementations require some additional configuration properties, which are shown in Table 31-5.
Table 31-5. Additional Pooling DataSource
Configuration Properties
Property | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
dataSourceName | String | Every pooling DataSource must have a unique name. |
initialConnections | int | The number of database connections to be created when the pool is initialized. |
maxConnections | int | The maximum number of open database connections to allow. When more connections are requested, the caller will hang until a connection is returned to the pool. |
Example 31-9 shows an example of typical application code using a pooling DataSource.
Example 31-9. DataSource Code Example
Code to initialize a pooling DataSource
might look like this:
Jdbc3PoolingDataSource source = new Jdbc3PoolingDataSource(); source.setDataSourceName("A Data Source"); source.setServerName("localhost"); source.setDatabaseName("test"); source.setUser("testuser"); source.setPassword("testpassword"); source.setMaxConnections(10);
Then code to use a connection from the pool might look like this. Note that it is critical that the connections are eventually closed. Else the pool will "leak" connections and will eventually lock all the clients out.
Connection con = null; try { con = source.getConnection(); // use connection } catch (SQLException e) { // log error } finally { if (con != null) { try { con.close(); } catch (SQLException e) {} } }
All the ConnectionPoolDataSource and DataSource implementations can be stored in JNDI. In the case of the nonpooling implementations, a new instance will be created every time the object is retrieved from JNDI, with the same settings as the instance that was stored. For the pooling implementations, the same instance will be retrieved as long as it is available (e.g., not a different JVM retrieving the pool from JNDI), or a new instance with the same settings created otherwise.
In the application server environment, typically the application server's DataSource instance will be stored in JNDI, instead of the PostgreSQL ConnectionPoolDataSource implementation.
In an application environment, the application may store the DataSource in JNDI so that it doesn't have to make a reference to the DataSource available to all application components that may need to use it. An example of this is shown in Example 31-10.
Example 31-10. DataSource
JNDI Code Example
Application code to initialize a pooling DataSource
and add
it to JNDI might look like this:
Jdbc3PoolingDataSource source = new Jdbc3PoolingDataSource(); source.setDataSourceName("A Data Source"); source.setServerName("localhost"); source.setDatabaseName("test"); source.setUser("testuser"); source.setPassword("testpassword"); source.setMaxConnections(10); new InitialContext().rebind("DataSource", source);
Then code to use a connection from the pool might look like this:
Connection con = null; try { DataSource source = (DataSource)new InitialContext().lookup("DataSource"); con = source.getConnection(); // use connection } catch (SQLException e) { // log error } catch (NamingException e) { // DataSource wasn't found in JNDI } finally { if (con != null) { try { con.close(); } catch (SQLException e) {} } }